In a Foreword to a book relating to an exhibition based on David Hockney’s stimulus to the academic world to revise its boundaries, in the history of art at least, Alan Bookbinder and Luke Syson say that the ‘project demonstrates that the phenomena of seeing and experiencing are germane to both science and art’. They go on to claim it represents ‘easing’ between these academic disciplinary borders that will, by ‘cross-pollination of ideas and innovation help us all look differently at the world we inhabit’. This blog reflects on a much needed attempt to examine seriously and with respect the ‘Hockney thesis’ in the 2022 book of the exhibition edited by Martin Gayford, Martin Kemp and Jane Munro ‘Hockney’s Eye: The Art and Technology of Depiction’
In a Foreword to a book relating to an exhibition based on David Hockney’s stimulus to the academic world to revise its boundaries, in the history of art at least, Alan Bookbinder and Luke Syson say that the ‘project demonstrates that the phenomena of seeing and experiencing are germane to both science and art’. They … More In a Foreword to a book relating to an exhibition based on David Hockney’s stimulus to the academic world to revise its boundaries, in the history of art at least, Alan Bookbinder and Luke Syson say that the ‘project demonstrates that the phenomena of seeing and experiencing are germane to both science and art’. They go on to claim it represents ‘easing’ between these academic disciplinary borders that will, by ‘cross-pollination of ideas and innovation help us all look differently at the world we inhabit’. This blog reflects on a much needed attempt to examine seriously and with respect the ‘Hockney thesis’ in the 2022 book of the exhibition edited by Martin Gayford, Martin Kemp and Jane Munro ‘Hockney’s Eye: The Art and Technology of Depiction’


![Ian Massey helps us to see again the power of Patrick Procktor’s intelligent defence of an aspect of painting that the artist named ‘theatrical’. Procktor’s summary of what was required in the development of modern painting was to say: “It is the expressive possibilities of the imagination which need to be extended.”’[1] This blog uses Ian Massey’s (2010) ‘Patrick Procktor: Art and Life’](https://i0.wp.com/livesteven.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/image-39.png?resize=365%2C365&ssl=1)
![‘I did more research on Alan Cumming for the writing of this book than I have ever done for any character I have ever portrayed’. This blog looks at why I booked to see Alan Cumming at the 2022 Edinburgh Book Festival on Sunday 21st August. It uses … my reading of a recent memoir (his second) by Alan Cumming [2021] ‘Baggage: Tales From A Packed Life’ (pictured). The blog is updated after seeing the event.](https://i0.wp.com/livesteven.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/image-32.png?resize=365%2C365&ssl=1)



![‘abstract expressions of inner life that, in contrast with the formal containment and smooth surfaces of much of [the sculpture described herein], read as maps of his state of mind. Usually made in materials of charcoal, pastel or crayon, many are of disorientating spaces: vortexes, tunnels and dead ends’. This blog contends that what is achieved in Ian Massey’s new book is a kind of beautiful and wondrous psychosocial geography indicating why queer people need that such communally local pictures of shared lives URGENTLY require writing. This blog reflects on Massey’s (2022) ‘Queer St Ives and Other Stories’.](https://i0.wp.com/livesteven.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/image.png?resize=365%2C365&ssl=1)



